The University Grants Commission (UGC) has instructed Pearl Academy, a Delhi-based fashion and management institute with centres in Noida, Jaipur and Mumbai, to stop awarding joint degrees with Nottingham Trent University (NTU) of Britain and close all its centres.
The higher education regulator’s order follows mounting complaints against private institutes tying up with foreign universities to offer degrees, which is not legally allowed in India.
“Pearl Academy is not authorised to grant any degree either in a standalone mode or in collaboration with any foreign university,” reads the UGC notice to Pearl Academy.
It said the institute is not a “university”, according to a 1956 law that governs India’s higher education system.
The CEO of Pearl Academy, Sharad Mehra, denied any wrongdoing, saying the institute has a heritage of more than two decades of excellence in education.
Many private institutes have collaborated with foreign universities and offer courses, promising an “international degree”. These degrees are invalid as Indian universities don’t recognise them. Their international acceptance is questionable too.
“It has become a matter of grave concern as many students are becoming victims of the fraudulent act of the institution,” the UGC said, barring Pearl Academy from enrolling “students for the coming academic session for any degree programme”.
Pearl Academy had acknowledged offering joint degrees with NTU, in response to a query from the education regulator.
A senior UGC official said the disclosure could invite legal action because only a university can offer degrees in India, not an institute. “A foreign university can only collaborate with an Indian university with prior approval from the UGC.”
The latest action came after Hindustan Times asked UGC through provisions in the right to information (RTI) act if it had taken any action against the institute.
The institute had admitted that 4,100 students were getting education at its four branches and the NTU-Pearl agreement went back to 1995. The official response has no name and designation of the signatory authority, though.
“The commission was not happy with Pearl Academy’s reply. After an inquiry, we decided to ask the institute to close down its centres,” the UGC official said.
A similar collaboration between Mewar University and Footwear Design and Development Institute (FDDI) was declared illegal last year. Mewar had collaborated to offer degrees on behalf of FDDI.
More than 4,000 students suffered then and were fighting a legal battle now.
@Based on Hindustan Times.
The Bangladesh government banned on Sunday broadcasting of India-based controversial preacher Zakir Naik’s Peace TV channel after reports that his “provocative” speeches inspired some of the militants who carried out the country’s worst terror attack at a cafe in Dhaka.
The decision to ban the Mumbai-based preacher’s ‘Peace TV Bangla’ was taken during a special meeting of Cabinet Committee on Law and Order, industry minister AAmir Hossain Amu, who chaired the meeting said.
@Agency report.
China reacted sharply on Friday to the US decision to deploy a missile defence system in South Korea, saying it would harm Beijing’s strategic security interests and heighten military tensions in the Korean peninsula.
Beijing’s reaction came within hours of Seoul announcing that the US and South Korea had made a joint decision to deploy the advanced Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) system, designed to shoot down short, medium and intermediate-range ballistic missiles.
The US has a military presence in South Korea under a bilateral agreement.
The decision to deploy the system came in the wake of North Korea carrying out tests of the Musudan intermediate-range ballistic missile that could threaten US military bases in Japan and within South Korea. The missile is believed to be capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.
In a joint statement, Seoul and Washington said the THAAD system will target missiles from North Korea, which shares a tense border with South Korea.
But the statement was no assurance for China.
“The Chinese side is strongly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes to this,” China’s foreign ministry said in statement on Friday morning.
The statement added the “deployment is not conducive to achieving denuclearisation in the Peninsula and maintaining its peace and stability”. China urged the two countries to withdraw their decision.
It asked the “US and Republic of Korea to terminate the deployment of THAAD” and “not to take actions which tend to complicate regional situation and harm China’s strategic security interests”.
A report from Seoul by China’s official Xinhua news agency said the decision had triggered “various controversies as it causes regional tensions and strong oppositions from people living in candidate sites amid remaining doubts about its military effectiveness”.
It quoted the Russian ambassador to South Korea, Alexander Timonin, as saying earlier that the US missile system would neither lend any support to peace and stability in Northeast Asia, nor provide any benefit in resolving nuclear issues on the Korean peninsula.
The report questioned the effectiveness of the THAAD system. “Military effectiveness of the THAAD operation in the South Korean soil has been in doubt as the advanced US missile defense system is designed to track and destroy missiles at a high altitude of 40-150 km. Hundreds of DPRK missiles targeting South Korea will fly at a much lower altitude of less than 20 km,” it said.
@Agency report.